How to write a research study critique
Are the size and major characteristics of the population studied described?
The best way is to find an article you like and discuss it with friends or relatives. The evaluation may consider different topics and sources including scientific articles, literature or poems. Email Address There was an error. Research Critique 1 Jamber, E.
Are the tables and figures if any well organized and easy to understand?
How to summarize and critique an article
Coaching experience would greatly effect the responses of the participants, yet this was not considered in the study. Read the discussion section of the article. More than just a casual skim, however, your reading needs to be in-depth with an eye toward certain elements. It will give the writing process a boost of energy. Organize your paper carefully and be careful not to jump around from one argument to the next. The evaluation may consider different topics and sources including scientific articles, literature or poems. Read the introduction section of the article. Does the sample size meet the suggested guideline for minimum sample size appropriate for the method of research represented? A MANOVA was used to analyze the data for differences between male and female coaches with regard to leadership behaviors. Every event has the cause and result. With additional information, the researchers may have been able to use a modified matching system when analyzing the results.
A student needs to show if the author delivers enough arguments to support his or her point of view. If you feel that the researchers are incorrect or off-base, point out problems with the conclusions and suggest alternative explanations.
Regardless of the turnaround time or field of study, you can be sure we have qualified personnel to handle the assignment for you. So, you need to provide the background in addition to the purpose of your critiques. Even the writing style is not as important as the ability to analyses.
Are appropriate descriptive or inferential statistics presented? Is each result discussed in terms of the original hypothesis to which it relates?
based on 92 review